MODERN LOGICAL-LINGUISTIC CLASSIFICATIONS OF MANIPULATIVE TECHNIQUES AND THEIR COMMUNICATIVE FEATURES

This article provides a comparative analysis of contemporary classifications of manipulative techniques within argumentation theory, pragmalinguistics, psycholinguistics, and logic. Approaches that explain manipulative influence in terms of strategic goals, the polysemy of linguistic units, lexical, morphological, and syntactic means, perlocutionary intentions, and intellectual vices are compared. The study also examines how manipulative techniques used in mass and interpersonal communication simultaneously combine logical, psychological, and linguistic components. As a result, the study demonstrates the possibility of characterizing manipulative techniques as a syncretic argumentative mechanism.