{
      "documents": [
          {
            "rev_number": 2,
            "main": "fulltext.pdf",
            "placement": 1,
            "eprintid": 1055,
            "format": "application/pdf",
            "security": "public",
            "language": "en",
            "docid": 6093,
            "files": [
                {
                  "mtime": "2026-05-11 04:30:06",
                  "filesize": 898755,
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "objectid": 6093,
                  "hash": "f59872166c46a22f62b27bbfeea1382c",
                  "filename": "fulltext.pdf",
                  "fileid": 9181,
                  "mime_type": "application/pdf",
                  "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/file/9181",
                  "datasetid": "document"
                }
            ],
            "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/document/6093",
            "pos": 1
          }
      ],
      "eprintid": 1055,
      "full_text_status": "public",
      "date": "2026-01-01",
      "datestamp": "2026-05-11 04:30:05",
      "status_changed": "2026-05-11 04:30:05",
      "pagerange": "53-57",
      "refereed": 1,
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "honourific": null,
            "given": "Ibadulla",
            "family": "Abdullayev",
            "lineage": null
          }
        }
      ],
      "publication": "Scientific and innovative research in the social and humanitarian sphere",
      "number": 5,
      "lastmod": "2026-05-11 04:30:05",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "id_number": "OJS:1322",
      "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/eprint/1055",
      "abstract": "The article presents a comparative analysis of the epistemological foundations of the ethics of Immanuel Kant and Al-Ghazali. The main objective is to identify the theoretical differences between rationalist (deontological) and spiritual-intuitive approaches and to explore their integration potential within contemporary philosophical discourse. The paper examines Kant\u2019s interpretation of moral cognition as an a priori, universal, and reason-based system, highlighting his concept of the categorical imperative as the logical and normative basis of moral decisions. At the same time, Al-Ghazali\u2019s doctrine emphasizes the connection between moral knowledge and spiritual purification of the heart, intention, and inner experience. The study compares two paradigms of moral cognition\u2014rational-normative and spiritual-intuitive epistemologies\u2014revealing their strengths and limitations. Drawing on modern philosophical approaches, including the principle of complementarity and dual-process theory, the necessity of integrating these approaches is substantiated.",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "type": "article",
      "volume": 3,
      "date_type": "published",
      "title": "RATIONALISM AND SPIRITUAL INTUITIONISM: EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ETHICS OF IMMANUEL KANT AND AL-GHAZALI",
      "rev_number": 3,
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "dir": "disk0/00/00/10/55",
      "issn": "3060-5059"
    }