TY  - JOUR
AV  - public
Y1  - 2026/01/01/
EP  - 57
SP  - 53
SN  - 3060-5059
JF  - Scientific and innovative research in the social and humanitarian sphere
N2  - The article presents a comparative analysis of the epistemological foundations of the ethics of Immanuel Kant and Al-Ghazali. The main objective is to identify the theoretical differences between rationalist (deontological) and spiritual-intuitive approaches and to explore their integration potential within contemporary philosophical discourse. The paper examines Kant?s interpretation of moral cognition as an a priori, universal, and reason-based system, highlighting his concept of the categorical imperative as the logical and normative basis of moral decisions. At the same time, Al-Ghazali?s doctrine emphasizes the connection between moral knowledge and spiritual purification of the heart, intention, and inner experience. The study compares two paradigms of moral cognition?rational-normative and spiritual-intuitive epistemologies?revealing their strengths and limitations. Drawing on modern philosophical approaches, including the principle of complementarity and dual-process theory, the necessity of integrating these approaches is substantiated.
VL  - 3
UR  - https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/1055/
A1  - Abdullayev, Ibadulla
IS  - 5
TI  - RATIONALISM AND SPIRITUAL INTUITIONISM: EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE ETHICS OF IMMANUEL KANT AND AL-GHAZALI
ID  - arxiv1055
ER  -