<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Komiljon</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Akhmedov</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The Middle East remains one of the regions most affected by conflicts in the contemporary international system. Since 1945, the United Nations has played a central role in efforts to manage armed conflicts in the region, facilitate negotiations, provide humanitarian assistance, and maintain international peace and security. This article evaluates the effectiveness of the UN in managing Middle Eastern conflicts through four analytical dimensions: peacekeeping activities, mediation, humanitarian response, and coercive instruments such as sanctions. The study applies a qualitative comparative approach using examples from Lebanon, Golan Heights, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Yemen. The findings demonstrate that the UN has achieved relatively positive outcomes in containing conflicts, monitoring ceasefires, and coordinating humanitarian activities, particularly where mandates were clearly defined and a limited consensus among major powers existed. However, the organization has been less successful in addressing the root causes of political conflicts, preventing prolonged civil wars, or ensuring implementation of decisions within highly polarized geopolitical environments. Structural factors such as veto politics within the United Nations Security Council, dependence on host-state consent, financial constraints, and fragmented regional rivalries continue to undermine operational effectiveness. The article concludes that the United Nations remains indispensable in the Middle East not as an institution capable of fully resolving all conflicts, but as a stabilizing mechanism that can mitigate escalation, preserve diplomatic channels, and support long-term peacebuilding efforts.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2026-01-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>