<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>THE ROLE OF POSH WORDS IN PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN MATERIALS</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Feruza</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Sobirova</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This article examines the role of “posh words,” meaning elevated, formal, and sophisticated vocabulary, in pre-election campaign materials. It analyzes how such lexical choices function as persuasive linguistic tools that construct authority, credibility, and emotional influence in political discourse. The article also explores the interaction between elevated vocabulary and stance features such as boosters, attitude markers, and self-mention strategies. Findings reveal that political language is intentionally designed to shape voter perception and guide public opinion. It is argued that stylistic features, especially sophisticated lexical choices, often have a stronger persuasive effect than factual content in electoral communication.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2026-01-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>