PublishScience PreprintsSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SENTENCES IN ENGLISH NOTARIAL TEXTSEzozkhonOrtikovaauthorThis article presents a structural analysis of sentences in English notarial texts, focusing on their grammatical organization and communicative functions within legal discourse. The study applies two complementary approaches: formal-grammatical classification (simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex sentences) and functional analysis based on systemic-functional grammar (theme-rheme structure and clause types). Empirical data from a corpus of notarial documents—including notarial certificates, powers of attorney, wills, and certified copies—reveal that complex and compound-complex sentences dominate all genres (60–80% of all sentences), reflecting the need for logical precision and legal inclusiveness. Declarative sentences are found to be almost the only sentence type used, while interrogative and exclamatory sentences are virtually absent, underscoring the impersonal and objective nature of notarial discourse. The analysis of subordinate clauses shows that relative clauses (restrictive) and complement clauses (especially “that”-clauses after performative verbs) are most frequent, whereas adverbial clauses are considerably rarer due to their affective and subjective connotations. Non-finite (“to”-infinitive, “-ing” participle, “-ed” participle) constructions are identified as key devices for increasing informational density. Theme-rheme distribution typically places temporal-locative phrases or institutional subjects (e.g., “I, a Notary Public…”) in theme position, thereby reinforcing the evidential and attestation function of notarial documents.2026-01-01Article

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant PublishScience Preprints the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that PublishScience Preprints does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at PublishScience Preprints is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.