The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS AND EARLY FRAMEWORKS OF TEXT COMPLEXITY ASSESSMENT
Assessing the complexity of written texts has been a persistent feature of instructional planning for decades. In recent years, the conceptualization of text complexity has evolved dramatically, moving from general qualitative assessments of a text’s rigor to more nuanced, multidimensional measurements. In this study, the historical evolution of text complexity assessment will be described in order to illustrate major shifts in theory and practice. Beginning with the foundational theories of Pestalozzi and Dewey, the study will move through the quantitative measures of complexity that emerged decades later via formulas such as Flesch-Kincaid and Lexile. A discussion of current thinking around text complexity as reflected in the College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS) will follow, also highlighting the qualitative and reader-centered features included in the framework. Finally, the study will conclude by reviewing the ways in which digital literacy and assessment of multimodal texts have added yet another layer of complexity to the evaluation of text(s). Using examples from general education and special education classrooms, the study will address how teachers have adapted the new concepts about text complexity in curriculum planning, instructional strategies, and literacy learning. Implications for effective pedagogy in today’s information age will be highlighted.
Scientific and innovative research in the social and humanitarian sphere
HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS AND EARLY FRAMEWORKS OF TEXT COMPLEXITY ASSESSMENT (PDF)
HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS AND EARLY FRAMEWORKS OF TEXT COMPLEXITY ASSESSMENT (Other)
HTML Summary of #1601 HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS AND EARLY FRAMEWORKS OF TEXT COMPLEXITY ASSESSMENT