{
      "lastmod": "2026-08-06 15:00:09",
      "refereed": 1,
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "title": "A METHODOLOGY FOR USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED REFLECTIVE TASKS TO DEVELOP STUDENTS\u2019 PHILOSOPHICAL AND REFLECTIVE THINKING",
      "eprintid": 1973,
      "publication": "Modern scientific and technical research",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "source": "https://ijcst.uz/",
      "full_text_status": "public",
      "id_number": "IJCST:109",
      "pagerange": "113-118",
      "status_changed": "2026-08-06 15:00:07",
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "honourific": null,
            "lineage": null,
            "given": "Dilnoza",
            "family": "Najimidinova"
          }
        }
      ],
      "abstract": "This article presents the theoretical and practical foundations of a methodology fordeveloping students\u2019 philosophical-reflective thinking through artificial intelligence (AI)-based reflective tasks. The author argues that the primary objective of contemporaryhigher education is not merely to transmit ready-made knowledge but to cultivatestudents\u2019 independent and critical thinking skills. The study examines both theopportunities and challenges associated with integrating Large Language Models (LLMs)into educational practice. It demonstrates that when AI is used solely as a source of ready-made answers, it may encourage intellectual passivity; however, when designed as an\u201cintellectual sparring partner,\u201d it becomes a powerful catalyst for reflective learning. Themethodology identifies five core competencies fostered through AI-assisted learning:questioning through the Socratic dialogue, argumentation, critical analysis, evaluation ofalternative perspectives, and drawing independent conclusions. The paper furtherintroduces the \u201cstudent\u2013teacher\u2013AI\u201d pedagogical triangle, a four-stage instructionalframework consisting of prompt design, AI-supported dialogue, reflective essay writing,and group discussion, as well as assessment criteria based on the S-D-T-M rubric and thedesign of a 12-week experimental study involving experimental and control groups. Theadvantages of the proposed methodology, including personalized learning, immediatefeedback, and increased learner motivation, are discussed alongside its limitations, suchas algorithmic bias, the changing role of the teacher, and ethical and legal concerns. Thefindings demonstrate the potential of integrating artificial intelligence into highereducation as an effective tool for fostering students\u2019 philosophical-reflective and criticalthinking.",
      "documents": [
          {
            "eprintid": 1973,
            "docid": 11429,
            "security": "public",
            "pos": 1,
            "placement": 1,
            "main": "fulltext.pdf",
            "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/document/11429",
            "language": "en",
            "format": "application/pdf",
            "rev_number": 2,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash": "d145aecfd01945faba2d6060453b5a60",
                  "fileid": 17215,
                  "filename": "fulltext.pdf",
                  "mime_type": "application/pdf",
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "filesize": 1342227,
                  "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/file/17215",
                  "mtime": "2026-08-06 15:00:10",
                  "objectid": 11429
                }
            ]
          }
      ],
      "type": "article",
      "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/eprint/1973",
      "dir": "disk0/00/00/19/73",
      "date": "2026-07-26",
      "rev_number": 3,
      "volume": 2,
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "number": 2,
      "date_type": "published",
      "datestamp": "2026-08-06 15:00:07"
    }