PublishScience PreprintsPRAGMALINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT COMMUNICATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEKGulnozaXushnazarovaauthorThis article presents a comparative-typological analysis of the pragmalinguistic features of conflict communication in English and Uzbek. The primary aim of the study is to identify the functional and pragmatic characteristics of pragmalinguistic units, communicative strategies, pragmatic markers, and linguocultural factors employed in conflict discourse. An empirical corpus consisting of 300 conflict communicative situations in English and 300 in Uzbek was compiled for the study. The analysis examines the functions of evaluative units, discourse markers, modal devices, presupposition, implicature, deictic units, and other pragmatic means in conflict discourse. The empirical findings demonstrate that, alongside certain similarities, there are significant linguocultural differences in the use of pragmalinguistic resources that structure conflict communication in English and Uzbek. English conflict discourse is characterized by a relatively frequent use of evaluative units and contrastive markers, as well as a predominance of explicit argumentation and confrontational strategies. In Uzbek, by contrast, mitigation devices, markers of respect, compromise, reconciliation, and face-saving strategies are used more actively. Based on the findings, a functional-pragmatic model of conflict discourse in English and Uzbek was developed.2026-01-01Article

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant PublishScience Preprints the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that PublishScience Preprints does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at PublishScience Preprints is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.