{
      "number": 9,
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "type": "article",
      "id_number": "OJS:2490",
      "date": "2026-01-01",
      "uri": "https://arxiv.publishscience.uz/id/eprint/2308",
      "publication": "Scientific and innovative research in the social and humanitarian sphere",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "given": "Nodirjon",
            "honourific": null,
            "lineage": null,
            "family": "Tuxlimurodov"
          }
        }
      ],
      "issn": "3060-5059",
      "date_type": "published",
      "lastmod": "2026-09-25 05:30:04",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "refereed": 1,
      "pagerange": "88-93",
      "title": "INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIAL COOPERATION AND COMPROMISE POSITION IN NEW UZBEKISTAN: CONSTITUTIONAL AND AXIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS",
      "abstract": "This article examines the institutional foundations of social cooperation and the position of compromise in New Uzbekistan through the principle of the \u201csocial state,\u201d the mahalla institution, and axiological-philosophical analysis. The first dimension traces the historical and philosophical development of the concept of the social state from L. Stein\u2019s conception to T. H. Marshall\u2019s theory of citizenship and compares liberal, corporatist, and social-democratic models based on G. Esping-Andersen\u2019s typology. The study analyzes the constitutional and legal foundations of the model emerging in New Uzbekistan, emphasizing that Article 1 of the Constitution, adopted in its new edition in 2023, officially defined Uzbekistan as a social state for the first time. The second dimension considers the mahalla institution as a structural mechanism for strengthening national security. The principles of proximity, continuity, and informal influence within mahalla-based reconciliation mechanisms are interpreted as institutional means of implementing compromise in practice. The third dimension analyzes the axiological foundations of compromise by integrating I. Berlin\u2019s value pluralism, M. Walzer\u2019s concept of \u201cthick and thin\u201d morality, and Abu Rayhan Beruni\u2019s empirical-comparative method. This synthesis forms a model of \u201clayered harmony\u201d between national and universal human values. The model also establishes the boundaries of compromise: the \u201cthick\u201d layer encompasses national traditions and customs, while the \u201cthin\u201d layer concerns human dignity and fundamental rights. The article substantiates the functional significance of social cooperation and compromise mechanisms for national security.",
      "full_text_status": "none",
      "status_changed": "2026-09-25 05:30:04",
      "eprintid": 2308,
      "rev_number": 1,
      "dir": "disk0/00/00/23/08",
      "volume": 3,
      "datestamp": "2026-09-25 05:30:04"
    }