PublishScience PreprintsEVOLUTION AND THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE CATEGORY OF SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: PHILOSOPHICAL-SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSISSirojiddinXayrullayevauthorThis article provides a philosophical and sociological analysis of the historical evolution and theoretical foundations of the category of social solidarity. The study is grounded in the growing relevance of examining social solidarity in contemporary society amid intensifying globalization, informatization, and democratic transformations. It traces and analyzes the evolution of the concept of social solidarity from ancient Greek philosophy (Aristotle) and Eastern social thought (Abu Nasr al-Farabi, Alisher Navoi, Confucius) to nineteenth-century sociology (Auguste Comte, Émile Durkheim) and twentieth-century social theories (Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas). Particular attention is given to Durkheim’s concepts of mechanical and organic solidarity, Parsons’ theory of the social system within functionalism, and Habermas’ theory of communicative action. The article also examines the views of Jadid intellectuals — Mahmudkhoja Behbudi, Abdurauf Fitrat, and Abdulla Avloni — on social solidarity and national revival. Uzbekistan’s experience is considered from the perspective of a model of social solidarity based on harmony among different religious communities and ethnic groups. The study systematically identifies the structural elements of social solidarity, including social cohesion, mutual trust, tolerance, civic responsibility, social justice, cooperation, spiritual unity, and ideological harmony. The author proposes a new definition of social solidarity, interpreting it not merely as external unity but as a complex socio-philosophical phenomenon that ensures the internal stability, spiritual integrity, and civic harmony of society.2026-01-01Article

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant PublishScience Preprints the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that PublishScience Preprints does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at PublishScience Preprints is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.