<mets:mets LABEL="Eprints Item" OBJID="eprint_2310" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/METS/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/mets.xsd http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mets="http://www.loc.gov/METS/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mets:metsHdr CREATEDATE="2026-10-22T09:02:28Z"><mets:agent ROLE="CUSTODIAN" TYPE="ORGANIZATION"><mets:name>PublishScience Preprints</mets:name></mets:agent></mets:metsHdr><mets:dmdSec ID="DMD_eprint_2310_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF IDEOLOGICAL HARMONY AND A CULTURE OF TOLERANCE IN ENSURING SOCIAL SECURITY: THE EXPERIENCE OF UZBEKISTAN</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Musojon</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Shavkatov</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This article analyzes the socio-philosophical foundations of ideological solidarity and a culture of tolerance in ensuring social security in a multiethnic society. The study examines the philosophical essence of social security, the classification of ideological threats, the dialectical relationship between ideological consensus and social stability, and the social significance of developing a culture of tolerance in ethnic and interfaith relations. The article systematically analyzes major factors that may threaten social security in the context of globalization, including religious extremism, information attacks, cosmopolitanism, and the incitement of ethnic hostility. It also examines the dialectical relationship between ideological solidarity and social stability and highlights the strategic importance of ensuring interethnic harmony and religious tolerance in Uzbekistan. Based on the research findings, the author proposes definitions of the concepts of “social security” and “ideological solidarity.” The article may serve as a scholarly resource for researchers and practitioners in philosophy, political science, and social studies.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2026-01-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:dmdSec><mets:amdSec ID="TMD_eprint_2310"><mets:rightsMD ID="rights_eprint_2310_mods"><mets:mdWrap MDTYPE="MODS"><mets:xmlData><mods:useAndReproduction>
<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by its own author:</strong>
In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic
metadata, I grant PublishScience Preprints the right to store
them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line.
I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I
understand that PublishScience Preprints does not assume any
responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these
files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their
copyright on the title page of their work.)</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><strong>For work being deposited by someone other than its
author:</strong> I hereby declare that the collection of files and
associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at
PublishScience Preprints is in the public domain. If this is
not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright
that distributing these files or metadata may entail.</p>

<p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Clicking on the <em>Deposit Item Now</em> button indicates your agreement to these
terms.</p>
    </mods:useAndReproduction></mets:xmlData></mets:mdWrap></mets:rightsMD></mets:amdSec><mets:fileSec></mets:fileSec><mets:structMap><mets:div ADMID="TMD_eprint_2310" DMDID="DMD_eprint_2310_mods"></mets:div></mets:structMap></mets:mets>