PublishScience PreprintsTHE LIMITS OF COMPARISON IN COMPARATIVE AND INTERCULTURAL PHILOSOPHY: THE PHENOMENON OF TRADITION BETWEEN UNIVERSALISM AND PLURALISMРахматКаримовauthorThe article analyzes the methodological potential and interrelationship of comparative philosophy and intercultural philosophy through the study of the phenomenon of tradition. It substantiates the distinction between a simple comparison of philosophical doctrines and comparative inquiry, arguing that comparative research should not be limited to identifying similarities and differences but should also explore possibilities for meaningful correspondence and dialogue among different philosophical traditions. The study identifies several methodological risks involved in comparing diverse cultural and philosophical systems, including neglecting context, interpreting functional similarity as ontological identity, and treating the West and the East as internally homogeneous systems. It also demonstrates the complementary role of such principles of intercultural philosophy as cognitive humility, unity without uniformity, tolerant pluralism, dialogue, and polylogue in comparative methodology. As a result, a contextual-dialogical model of intercultural comparison is proposed, integrating contextualization, the assessment of comparability, hermeneutic interpretation, and dialogical verification. This model makes it possible to analyze similarities among traditions without losing their historical and cultural specificity.2026-01-01Article

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant PublishScience Preprints the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that PublishScience Preprints does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at PublishScience Preprints is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.