PublishScience PreprintsTHE ARTISTIC INTERPRETATION OF MA’RIFAT (ENLIGHTENMENT) IN THE WORKS OF ALISHER NAVOI AND WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE: A COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL STUDYMaxliyoMirzaaxmedovaauthorThis article examines the artistic and philosophical interpretation of the concept of ma’rifat (enlightenment and spiritual knowledge) in the works of Alisher Navoi and William Shakespeare from a comparative-typological perspective. Although the two authors belong to different literary, religious, philosophical, and cultural traditions, their works devote considerable artistic attention to knowledge, self-understanding, moral perfection, truth, justice, and the transformation of the human personality. The article draws on examples from Hayrat ul-Abror, Saddi Iskandariy, Hamlet, and King Lear. In Navoi’s works, ma’rifat is closely associated with divine knowledge, spiritual purification, wisdom, justice, the discipline of the nafs, and the Sufi concept of the perfect human being. In Shakespeare’s tragedies, by contrast, knowledge is acquired primarily through doubt, experience, suffering, self-examination, and moral choice. The article argues that, rather than seeking direct historical influence between the two literary systems, it is more appropriate to identify their functional and typological affinities. The comparative analysis demonstrates that Navoi primarily interprets perfection as a spiritually oriented movement toward harmony among knowledge, morality, and divine truth, whereas Shakespeare dramatically presents knowledge as an unstable and often painful process leading to an understanding of the self, other human beings, and the moral structure of human existence.2026-01-01Article

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant PublishScience Preprints the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that PublishScience Preprints does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at PublishScience Preprints is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.