<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>INTEGRATION OF BLOOM’S TAXONOMY AND THE COGNITIVE COMPONENTS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN A DIGITAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENT</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Ulug‘bek</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Rasulov</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This article examines contemporary methodological approaches to assessing students’ professional competence in the context of the digitalization of higher education. It explores the possibilities of diagnosing prospective teachers’ professional and pedagogical competence in a digital assessment environment based on Bloom’s Taxonomy and its revised model developed by Anderson and Krathwohl. The levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy—knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, evaluation, and creation—are considered in integration with the cognitive components of professional competence. The didactic and psychometric characteristics of traditional tests and profession-oriented situational (case-based) tests developed on the basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy are comparatively analyzed.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2026-01-01</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>